Legal Opinion

Beliron Construction Co. v. Potomac Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1974No. Appeal, No. 683PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

This appeal arises from the plaintiff’s judgment, after a jury trial, on its assumpsit claim below. The plaintiff, Beliron Construction Co. (Beliron), maintained that through its agent, Mr. Griffiths, it had orally entered into a special multiple-peril (SMP) insurance policy with the defendant, Potomac Insurance Co. (Potomac); and, that the policy provided for a $50,000 payment as the result of the fire that leveled Beliron’s newly purchased fabricating plant on June 4, 1967. Potomac argues, inter aUa, that the evidence of such an *381agreement was insufficient to support…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnold Pontiac-Gmc, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Argo Welded Products, Inc. v. J. T. Ryerson Steel & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Yellow Run Coal Co. v. Alma-Elly-Yv Mines, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Great Northern Insurance v. ADT Security Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Martha Co. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API