Legal Opinion

Anthony Granza and Vincent Ferrara v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1967No. 22064_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants Granza and Ferrara have filed a petition for rehearing, urging several grounds therefor. The first contention is that they terminated their participation in the conspiracy prior to the Houston shipment of heroin. They rely on testimony by the coconspirator Abramson to the effect that appellants had told him prior to the transaction in Houston that they would like to quit the conspiracy. We cannot accept this expression of desire to be finished with the conspiracy as an actual termination.

The contention that the appellants’ handwriting exemplars were protected by the Fifth…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Kirksey McCord Nix, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. George McGann and Harold Mote PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Ted Banks and Don AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. William Fred Dryden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Anthony Granza and Vincent FerraraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API