Legal Opinion

Steinway v. Steinway & Sons

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 17 opinions

• Action to restrain the continuance of certain corporate acts as ultra s vires and void. . .

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

The plaintiff is a stockholder of the defendant corporation, Steinway & Sons, and. brings this action against, the trustees of the corporation for injunctive relief restraining the continuance .of certain acts alleged to be ultra vires, or to involve wasteful, extravagant • and unnecessary expenditures, having no proper relation to the business of the corporation. An accounting is also asked for in respect to past transactions- of • this character, - and the enforcement of a personal liability against the trustees ¡to the corporation by reason of these- alleged unlawful acts. •

It is-proper to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leslie v. . LorillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. The Herald Company, (Cross-Appellant) v. Donald R. Seawell, (Cross-Appellees)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Heinz v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Corning Glass Works v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  5. A. P. Smith Manufacturing Co. v. BarlowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API