James v. Aller
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On Mil, answer, replication and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
Emery, V. C.
This suit calls in question separate transactions of two kinds-between complainant and his children. The first transaction *53relates to the conveyance by complainant to his children of his homestead, and to the assignment to them, at the same time, of mortgages for $4,200, and the second transaction relates to the delivery, some time later, by the complainant to his daughter, Mr's. Aller, or to his son-in-law, the defendant T. Owen Aller, ■of money or notes amounting to either $4,000 or $5,000. Complainant’s own evidence in relation to the first of these transactions differs…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Dunn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Broad St. National Bank v. HoldenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931