Legal Opinion

James v. Aller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 19, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On Mil, answer, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

This suit calls in question separate transactions of two kinds-between complainant and his children. The first transaction *53relates to the conveyance by complainant to his children of his homestead, and to the assignment to them, at the same time, of mortgages for $4,200, and the second transaction relates to the delivery, some time later, by the complainant to his daughter, Mr's. Aller, or to his son-in-law, the defendant T. Owen Aller, ■of money or notes amounting to either $4,000 or $5,000. Complainant’s own evidence in relation to the first of these transactions differs…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Broad St. National Bank v. HoldenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API