Legal Opinion
Gambolati v. Sarkisian
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 14, 1993No. 92-2105PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
622 So.2d 47 (1993)
Cam GAMBOLATI, Appellant,
v.
Norman SARKISIAN, Appellee.
No. 92-2105.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 14, 1993.
David S. Romanik of Romanik, Lavin & Huss, Hollywood, for appellant.
No brief filed for appellee.
2Per curiam
Cam Gambolati, defendant below, appeals an order denying his entitlement to attorney's fees and costs pursuant to the civil theft statute. We reverse and remand with direction to proceed in accordance with this opinion. Norman Sarkisian, plaintiff below, has failed to file an answer brief to rebut the arguments raised by Gambolati herein.
In 1985,…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Belford Trucking Co. v. ZagarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Rosen v. MarlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Friedman v. LAUDERDALE MEDICAL EQUIP. SERVICE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Capital Partners Inv. Co. v. AM. INV GROUP, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
4Cited by21 opinions
- Ginsberg v. Lennar Florida HoldingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Sarkis v. Pafford Oil Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Bel-Bel International Corp. v. Community Bank of HomesteadCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Great Wall de Venezuela C.A. v. Interaudi BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Tambourine Comercio Internacional SA v. SolowskyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.