Legal Opinion

Acosta and Rosas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1915No. 3762PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellants were convicted under an indictment charging them with robbery, and their punishment assessed at five years-confinement in the penitentiary.

Since said conviction, and while this case was pending in this court on appeal, it is made to appear by affidavits on file that appellant Samual Rosas has escaped from custody. The State’s motion to dismiss the appeal as to said appellant is, therefore, sustained, and this cause dismissed as to said appellant Samual Rosas.

There are no bills of exception in the record. The special charges requested by appellant were all given,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Denham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Hammons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Cruz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API