Legal Opinion

Bucci v. Zampbell

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 13, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPettingell, P. J.

Action of contract to recover an amount alleged to be due for groceries. The plaintiff’s declaration is for a lump sum of $484.56 “for groceries sold and delivered” without any statement of dates, articles or prices. The answer is a general denial, payment and the statute of limitations.

The defendant filed a “Motion for Further Particulars,” specifying as particulars to be furnished, an itemized account of the groceries alleged to have been sold, giving the date and price of each item.

The plaintiff filed “Further Particulars” in three items, as follows:

“December 24, 1933. Balance due for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leshefsky v. American EmPloyers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Nickerson v. GlinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Spencer v. BurakiewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Fels v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Gill v. StrettonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rendek v. HodgsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API