Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Angeles-Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 26, 2005No. 19-30313PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

In these consolidated appeals, defendants challenge adjustments made to their sentencing ranges under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. 1 Although the district court correctly decided most of the issues on appeal, it did err in applying the vulnerable victim adjustment, U.S.S.G. § 3Al.l(b)(l). For this reason, we vacate and remand for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511 (5th Cir.2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517), and their progeny.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Fortino Saucedo VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. DuhonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API