Legal Opinion

Lehman v. Lehman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 6, 1912No. 19,255PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from First District Court, Parish of Caddo; E. W. Sutherlin, Judge. Action by Henry Lehman against Mrs. Elizabeth Lehman and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.

Henry E. Lehman died, without having disposed by last will or testament of his interest in the community property. He left no issue, and was survived by his wife, his father, and a brother.

The brother and the widow each claims to have inherited three-fourths of the estate, conceding one-fourth to the father. The father claims the entire estate.

The Code provides that in the absence of issue, or of a father or mother, the brothers and sisters take the entire succession; that they take three-fourths in case there is no issue, but a father or mother; that, in the absence of ascendants and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Benedict v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. State ex rel. DaPonte v. Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  3. State ex rel. Louisiana Imp. Co. v. Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  4. Globe Lumber Co. v. ClementSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Crescent Bed Co. v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Succession of GreenlawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. Succession of StallingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. United States v. HarangCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  4. Frank v. WatersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Succession of LambertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API