Legal Opinion

Berroteran v. Quirk and Tratos

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 25, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00396Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 ABELARDO BERROTERAN, Case No. 2:21-cv-000396-RFB-EJY 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 QUIRK AND TRATOS et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court are two motions: pro se Plaintiff Berroteran’s Motion for Rehearing for 14 Appointment of Counsel and Motion for Reconsideration. ECF Nos. 35, 40. The Court construes 15 the Motion for Rehearing for Appointment of Counsel as an Objection/Appeal of the Magistrate 16 Judge’s Order (ECF No. 30). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies both motions. 17 18 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 19…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Vernon C. Weygandt v. Donald Look, Superintendent, and the Attorney General for the State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API