Legal Opinion

Scieszka v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 6, 2003No. A02A2423PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

John Alexander Scieszka was convicted on seventeen counts arising from attacks on five different women in the Five Points area of Athens, Georgia. He appeals following the trial court’s denial of his amended motion for new trial. We affirm for the reasons set forth below.

1. Scieszka first asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by requiring him to wear a stun belt throughout the trial without any finding of necessity for such a measure. He asserts that wearing the stun belt interfered with his right to participate in his defense.

As an initial matter, we note that there…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. FrancisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. United States v. Jeffery Scott DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Godfrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. McMillan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. Doss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API