Legal Opinion
Nappe v. Nappe
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 16, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.J. 337 (1956)
120 A.2d 31
H. ROSE NAPPE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MORITZ NAPPE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 28, 1955.
Decided January 16, 1956.
Mr. Theodore D. Parsons argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona & Combs, attorneys; Mr. William R. Blair, Jr., on the brief).
Mr. Benjamin M. Ratner argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by OLIPHANT, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, setting aside and declaring null and void a decree…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Coe v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re FeltmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968