Sullivan v. State

Dillard, Judge.

Following a trial by jury, Michael Sullivan was convicted of influencing a witness. On appeal, Sullivan contends that (1) the trial court erred by permitting the State to admit portions of confidential conversations between himself and his private investigator; (2) the trial court erred by denying him the opportunity to impeach a State witness with portions of an audiotape; and (3) the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. For the reasons set forth infra, we affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict,1 the record shows that prior to the…