Adar v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Dissent
WIENER, Circuit Judge,
with whom BENAVIDES, CARL E. STEWART, DENNIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting:
Convinced that we should affirm the district court by holding that the Full Faith and Credit Clause (“FF&C Clause”) creates a federal right that is actionable against state actors via 42 U.S.C. § 1983, I respectfully dissent.
At the very core of the issue that I take with the en banc majority is my rejection out of hand of the linchpin of their assertion, i.e., that the FF&C Clause imposes obligations solely on state courts and not on any other state actors. I reject that credo for…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.