Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adar v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 12, 2011No. 09-30036Published

1Dissent

WIENER, Circuit Judge,

with whom BENAVIDES, CARL E. STEWART, DENNIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting:

Convinced that we should affirm the district court by holding that the Full Faith and Credit Clause (“FF&C Clause”) creates a federal right that is actionable against state actors via 42 U.S.C. § 1983, I respectfully dissent.

At the very core of the issue that I take with the en banc majority is my rejection out of hand of the linchpin of their assertion, i.e., that the FF&C Clause imposes obligations solely on state courts and not on any other state actors. I reject that credo for…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API