County Board of Arlington County v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whiting
In this appeal, we decide whether the State Tax Commissioner’s assessment of railroad real estate based upon an appraisal technique known as the “unit method” is consistent with the provisions of Article X, § 2 of the Constitution of Virginia. As pertinent, that section provides: “[a] 11 assessments of real estate and tangible personal property shall be at their fair market value, to be ascertained as prescribed by law.” Id.
In general terms, the unit method, as applied in this case, involves an appraisal of all railroad property as a single operating unit or a “going concern.” The railroad’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- ITT World Communications, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Arlington County Board v. GinsbergSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. State Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- Norfolk and Western Railway Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971
- N. AND W. RY. CO. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac R. Co. v. ForstCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Florida E. Coast Ry. Co. v. Dept. of Rev.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. ForstDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Richmond, Fredericksburg, & Potomac Railroad v. ForstDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Chesapeake Western Railway v. ForstCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.