Philadelphia Record Co. v. Curtis-Martin Newspapers, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
This proceeding presents a situation somewhat unusual, indeed without even a close parallel, so far as we have been able to discover, in the decisions of any court of final appeal. The two defendant newspapers were compelled by a decree of the court below, which our order superseded, to sell a certain edition of their newspapers, known as the “bulldog” edition, to a specified group of newspaper venders, with whom they had no contractual relation, for resale by them. Inasmuch as the publication and sale of newspapers is a private enterprise and corporations…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fredericks v. HuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Commonwealth v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Gemmell v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Drum v. DinkelackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Holden v. LlewellynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- McMullan v. WOHLGEMUTHSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Williams v. BridySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Stewart E. Davis, an Individual v. United States Gypsum Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Trainer v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local No. 516Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.