Legal Opinion
United States v. Qubid Coleman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 24, 2015No. 14-2246PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAH, District Judge.
Faced with a mandatory life sentence, Qubid Coleman agreed to cooperate with the government, signed a plea agreement, and entered a plea of guilty to a drug conspiracy charge. The plea agreement contained a waiver of Coleman’s right to collaterally attack his conviction or sentence. At the guilty-plea hearing, Coleman said that he reviewed the agreement, understood it, and talked about it with his lawyer, but the district judge did not expressly discuss the collateral-attack waiver with Coleman. At sentencing, the district court imposed conditions of supervised release…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Parrish KappesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Thomas Hurlow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Matthew JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. David MobleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2023
- United States v. Matthew JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.