Legal Opinion

Williams v. Marziano

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 14, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

78 N.J. Super. 265 (1963)

188 A.2d 314

RUTH L. WILLIAMS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF HERBERT J. WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF,

v.

DOMINICK MARZIANO AND WILLIAM S. BRANDT, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided February 14, 1963.

Mr. David A. Rappeport, attorney for plaintiff.

Mr. Joseph T. Ryan for defendant Dominick Marziano (Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys).

Mr. James T. Clare for defendant William S. Brandt (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys).

GLICKENHAUS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

The first part of this motion is to strike requests for admissions served by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. UpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  2. Garafola v. Rosecliff Realty Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Jones v. Boyd Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
  4. Electric Furnace Co. v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
  5. Fuhr v. Newfoundland-St. Lawrence Shipping Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Voisin v. LukeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  2. Myers v. St. Francis HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Van Langen v. ChadwickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API