Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Finch

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 20, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

Plaintiffs seek to recover a real estate commission evidenced by the promissory note in suit. The defense is predicated on the grounds (1) that there was a conditional delivery of the note, and (2) that there was a false and fraudulent representation inducing the execution of the note. An affirmative answer to either of the questions presented by the issues precludes plaintiffs’ right of recovery. (1) Was there-an oral agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant that the note should not be paid until a condition had been performed, to wit: the full performance of a land sale contract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Riley v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Sutton v. GreinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Anthon State Bank v. BernardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Mason v. CaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Creamer v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eaton v. DowneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. International Stock Food Co. v. BesheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Versteeg v. HoevenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. First National Bank v. MetherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API