Thompson v. Finch
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.
Plaintiffs seek to recover a real estate commission evidenced by the promissory note in suit. The defense is predicated on the grounds (1) that there was a conditional delivery of the note, and (2) that there was a false and fraudulent representation inducing the execution of the note. An affirmative answer to either of the questions presented by the issues precludes plaintiffs’ right of recovery. (1) Was there-an oral agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant that the note should not be paid until a condition had been performed, to wit: the full performance of a land sale contract…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Riley v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Sutton v. GreinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Anthon State Bank v. BernardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Mason v. CaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Creamer v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eaton v. DowneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- International Stock Food Co. v. BesheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Versteeg v. HoevenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- First National Bank v. MetherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933