Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Carroll

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

The plaintiff is seeking to recover for services rendered the defendant as housekeeper, and for *12other services, covering a period of six years. The jury found for the plaintiff. The exceptions relate to the admission of evidence.

The judge, subject to the defendant’s exception, permitted the plaintiff, in cross-examination of the defendant, to show that, in March, 1924, after he had been notified by the plaintiff’s attorney of her claim and before action was brought, he had conveyed his home to the woman who later became his wife. A certified copy of the deed was admitted in evidence. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warner v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Portland Gas Light Co. v. RuudMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Proctor v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Smith v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Wilson v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Labrie v. MidwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. D'Arcangelo v. TartarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Harrington v. AlessiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API