RICHARD C. JONES v. UNITED STATES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceBeckwith, Associate Judge
In arguing that attempted threats is not a valid crime in the District, Mr. Jones relies on the Supreme Court’s decision in Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344, 111 S.Ct. 1854, 114 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991), which stated that the elements “for an ‘attempt’ at common law ... include a specific intent to commit the unlawful act.” Id. at 351 n. *, 111 S.Ct. 1854 (citing *133Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 263, 72 S.Ct. 240, 96 L.Ed. 288 (1952)). I write separately to make note of an inconsistency in our case law regarding the extent to which this common law proposition applies in the District…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Braxton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.