Legal Opinion

State v. . Covington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was indicted for forgery of an order, of which the following is a copy:

Oct. 27th, 1884.(914) Mr. R. T. Long, Please let Henry Carmone have 500 dollars and I will be in Monday and pay you oblige yours J. M. HAWOOD.

The State introduced J. M. Haywood, who testified that he did not sign or authorize any one to sign the order for him; that he wrote his name "J. M. Haywood," and not "Hawood"; that he knew R. T. Long, but did not know whether Long knew him; that he never had any transactions with Long; that he was the son of James Haywood.

James Haywood, a witness for the State,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. . Cross and WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. State v. . LeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. State v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  5. State v. . Bob ThornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Robertson v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API