Legal Opinion
State v. Spotted Elk
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 13, 2001No. 19230-0-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
34 P.3d 906 (2001)
109 Wash.App. 253
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Pamela Faye SPOTTED ELK, Appellant.
No. 19230-0-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Two.
November 20, 2001.
As Amended on Denial of Reconsideration December 13, 2001.
William D. Edelblute, Attorney at Law, Spokane, Counsel for Appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, III, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, Counsel for Respondent.
BROWN, A.C.J.
A jury convicted Pamela Spotted Elk of possessing heroin. On appeal, among other contentions, she argues her incriminating statements should have been suppressed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. OlmedoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. KooymanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.