State v. Welch
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentJohnson, J.
Today, the majority rules that the police have unlimited access to the prescription records of every pharmacist in the state of Vermont and may, without warrant or probable cause, search those records in hopes of finding violations of law, not by pharmacists, but by patients. In other words, as a consequence of today’s ruling, the prescription records of all persons held by a Vermont pharmacist are open to unrestricted surveillance by the police.
One of the great conservative justices of the United States Supreme Court once observed that <([t]he history of liberty has largely been the history…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.