Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hanrahan v. Zupnik

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided June 19, 1952No. Nos. 602097, 602098, 602099, 602100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HOOVER, J.

These are four mandamus cases. Each is a group action to enforce pensions. Two cases involve police pensions. Two *465eases involve firemen’s pensions. In each case, the respondents are the particular pensions fund’s trustees, its custodian and the City of Cleveland. The facts are all agreed. Only questions of law are presented. Firemen’s pensions are governed by §4600 GC, et seq. Police pensions are governed by §4616 GC, et seq.

One of the police cases and one of the firemen’s cases involves pensioners who were qualified and placed on the respective pension payrolls prior to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. MarionOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MuqdadyCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2000
  2. Hall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API