Legal Opinion

Redfield v. Middleton

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided November 17, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from an order granting an injunction and directing the appointment of a receiver. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Woodruff, J.

—Before considering the allegations which are claimed to charge upon the defendant conduct which ought to be restrained by injunction, or inquiring how far those allegations are met and overcome by the defendant, it will be useful to notice that there are but two persons who are parties to this action. The suit is prosecuted by the plaintiff, in no representative character known to the law. By reason of his having *650received, from the author, “the advance sheets” of two of the works of Richard C. Trench, and his having put them in the hands of a stereotyper, and ordered plates thereof upon his…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ladd & Bush v. RamsbyOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Manhattan Gaslight Co. v. BarkerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1868
  3. Roberts v. MathewsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1864
  4. Redfield v. MiddletonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API