Legal Opinion · Dissent

Linnear v. Centerpoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 2006No. 41,171-CAPublished

1Dissent

DISSENT FROM THE DENIAL OF REHEARING

GALLAGHER, J.,

ad hoc, and GONZALES, J., ad hoc, dissenting.

| .With all due deference to the opinion of the majority, we respectfully dissent from the denial of rehearing for the reasons that follow.

The majority opinion makes a monumental change in Louisiana tort law by applying the concept of res ipsa loquitur to an ordinary negligence case. The practical effect of the methodology employed in the majority opinion would be to require a trial court to give a res ipsa loquitur *16charge any time jurors could have .a reasonable disagreement as to any fact issue.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Jordan v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  3. Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Boudreaux v. American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  5. Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API