Bata v. National Surety Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
To determine whether $100,000 involved in defendant’s counterclaim was received for “ the use and benefit ” of defendant’s assignors, would require determination of issues already raised between plaintiff and defendant’s assignors in many other actions now pending between such parties. This would unduly delay and prejudice plaintiff seeking recovery against defendant’s surety under section 835 of the Civil Practice Act. Accordingly in the discretion of the court as provided by section 262 of the Civil Practice Act the order appealed from should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Ippisch v. Moricz-SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956