Legal Opinion

Didia v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1939No. 9106PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

From conviction on four counts of an indictment charging appellant with the removal of labels containing the words “Made in Japan”, on merchandise imported from Japan, appellant has brought this appeal.

19 U.S.C.A. § 1304(a) provides in part: “Every article imported into the United States * * * shall be marked * * * in legible English words, in a conspicuous place, in such manner as ■ to indicate "the country of origin of such article, in accordance with such regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe. * * ”

Subdivision (d) provides a penalty if “any person…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Irving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willie Frank Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Willie Frank Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API