Legal Opinion

Franco Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1961No. Appeal, No. 20PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The claimant in this unemployment compensation case was denied benefits by the bureau, the referee and the board because he failed to report at the employment office during the weeks for which he is now seeking compensation.

One of the prerequisites in qualifying for benefits is the requirement of §401 (b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of December 5, 1986, as amended, 43 P.S. §801, that the claimant “Has registered for work at, and thereafter continued to report at, an employment office in accordance with such regulations as the secretary may prescribe ...”

The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stanek v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Whalen Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Leonhard Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API