Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Keating

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 30, 1916No. Gen. No. 22,268PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles H. Bowles, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13a*—how defect of variance in statement of claim must be taken advantage of. Where there is a variance or a dual statement of cause of action in a statement of claim in the Municipal Court of Chicago, such defects can be taken advantage of only by a motion to strike, accompanied by a statement of the reasons therefor made to the trial judge, and a mere motion to strike, without giving reasons, is not sufficient. 2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13a*—When defects in statement of claim are cured by verdict. Defects in a statement of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weinberger v. WerremeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API