Legal Opinion

United States v. Xochitl Garcia-Santana

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 20, 2014No. 12-10471PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

The government appeals the dismissal of Xóchitl Garcia-Santana’s indictment for unlawful reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court determined that Garcia’s prior removal order was constitutionally inadequate because Garcia was denied her right to seek discretionary relief from removal. We affirm. In doing so, we hold that the generic definition of “conspiracy” under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(U), includes proof of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.

I

In 2002, Garcia pleaded guilty to “conspiracy…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Xochitl Garcia-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Tavares ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API