Legal Opinion
Bechler v. Parsekian
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 11, 1961PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jacobs, J.
On Eebruary 9, 1959 the plaintiff G. Ered Bechler was involved in a reportable accident. See N. J. S. A. 39:4-130. He was then 62 years of age. On Eebruary 1, 1960 the Division of Motor Yehicles sent a letter to the plaintiff advising him that the Division had a policy of reexamining all drivers involved in fatal accidents or in two accidents within a period of one year and “all drivers over age 60 who have been involved in one reportable accident, regardless of responsibility.” The letter enclosed a physical examination form to be completed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wignall v. FletcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- State v. MosengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Nulter v. State Road Commission of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Ratliff v. LamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Carnegie v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- In Re KallenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- De Vitis v. New Jersey Racing Com'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Colling v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Graham v. NJ Real Estate Com'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.