Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of del Drago
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided June 27, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The petitioner has moved to amend and resettle a decree dated February 15,1939, and a supplemental decree dated August 31,1939, made in a proceeding brought by the executors for leave to improve and rehabilitate real property left by the testatrix. The motion is denied. No legal or equitable ground for the modification, amendment or resettlement of such decrees has been shown.
The petitioner is Prince Giovanni del Drago. He is a coexecutor of the estate, the husband of the testatrix, and the life tenant of the residuary trust. Extensive testimony has been taken upon the question of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stevens v. . MelcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of AlbertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In Re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In re the Estate of AdlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holmes, Trustee v. HrobonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- In re the Estate of DaviesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- McDonald v. HoffmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- In re the Estate of BuckleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956