Legal Opinion

Pittway Corporation, and Subsidiaries v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 18, 1996No. 96-1968PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Pittway Corporation inserted butane into containers as an aerosol propellant. Section 4661(a) of the Internal Revenue Code taxes the manufacturer of ’ certain chemicals,, among them butane. The IRS taxed Pittway for using the butane in the manufacturing of the various aerosol products. Pittway claims that its customers are the manufacturers who should pay the tax and seeks a refund of $236,056 in taxes it paid to the government under Section 4661(a). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the government. We affirm.

I. Background

Pittway was a “contract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. First Chicago Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel J. Balint and James A. KetchumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Kovacs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Tonja Treadway v. Gateway Chevrolet Oldsmobile Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. McCabe v. Crawford & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  5. Ray G. Olander v. Bucyrus-Erie CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API