Legal Opinion

Verley v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered March 23, 1960, denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend her notice of claim and to strike out paragraph “ Third ” of defendant’s answer, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The written notice of claim filed by the compensation insurance carrier, which itself had a contingent interest in plaintiff’s cause of action by virtue of subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, was sufficient also to constitute a notice of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Moskol v. SoodDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API