Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hopkins v. Hopkins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1807Published

This was a libel similar to the preceding. The adultery ivas alleged to have been committed at Homer, in the state of New York, and that appeared to have been the settled place of abode oi "the parties at the time. The libellant has since removed into this county.

1ConcurrenceSedgwick, J.

I concur with my brother These parties lived in the state of New York at the time the fact took place on which the application is grounded. Since that time the libellant has removed into this county, leaving his wife at her former place of resi dence. The statute which gives to this Court its jurisdiction in this class of cases, expressly limits that jurisdiction to the court holden for the county where the parties live. (Certainly it cannot be said that these parties live in this county.) I am disposed to give this statute a liberal construction ; and therefore if the parties had dwelt here…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. AnonymousMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Mace v. MaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  4. Smith v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API