Legal Opinion

Brunswick Land Corp. v. Perkinson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 16, 1930PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The opinion of the trial judge, Hon. M. R. Peterson, sufficiently states the issue and the reasons which support the judgment. It follows:

*606“The present action is a proceeding instituted on April 7, 1927, by notice of motion to recover damages for a trespass on the plaintiff’s land. The damages claimed represent the estimated value of certain timber cut and removed by the defendant, the undergrowth destroyed, and consequential injury to the freehold, etc.
“As stipulated by the agreement of counsel, the primary question in the case arises upon the defendant’s plea of the statute of limitation,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. BoozerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Welson v. TriplettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  3. Daniel v. RoperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1863

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corp. v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Westminster Investing Corp. v. Lamps Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Ball v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. Lockney v. VroomVirginia Circuit Court · 2003
  5. City Nat. Bank v. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API