Legal Opinion
H.P. v. Naperville Community Unit School District 203
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 7, 2018No. 1:17-cv-05377Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION H.P., a minor, by and through her father, —_) W.P., ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 17 C5377 ) v. ) Jeffrey T. Gilbert ) Magistrate Judge NAPERVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT ) SCHOOL DISTRICT #203, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider [ECF No. 106] is denied. See Statement below for further details.’ STATEMENT The purpose of a motion pursuant to Rule 59(e) is to ask the court to reconsider matters “properly encompassed in a decision on the merits.” Osterneck v. Ernst & Whitney, 489 U.S. 169, 174 91989). A…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole, a French Banking Corporation v. Cbi Industries, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Richard F. Harrington, Tavares Harrington, Tyjuan Kidd v. City of Chicago, Officer Delgado, Officer MoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.