Legal Opinion

Watson v. American National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1917No. 8557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari; from Bleckley superior court—Judge Graham. January 12, 1911. ,

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. Tlie note sued upon was by its terms payable to the order of the maker. It appeared to have been duly indorsed by him, and suit thereon was brought by the American National Bank as holder. “A promissory note payable to the order of the maker thereof and properly indorsed by him is a negotiable instrument, and the holder is presumed to be such bona fide and for value, and is protected from any defense set up by the maker, acceptor, or indorser, except non est factum, gambling, or immoral and illegal consideration, or fraud in its procurement by the holder.” Pryor v. American Trust &c. Co.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pryor v. American Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Grooms v. Olliff & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Robenson v. VasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  4. Citizens Bank v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Evans v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Moore v. Southern Discount CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API