Legal Opinion

Domich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 4, 1927No. 26,264PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying an application for a rehearing on the claim of Joe Domich for compensation under the workmen’s compensation law.

Granting a rehearing or new hearing rests in the discretion of the commission, and its action is final unless an abuse of discretion clearly appears. Stippel v. Charles Friend & Son, 161 Minn. 471, 201 N. W. 934; Zeglin v. Yost, 163 Minn. 264, 203 N. W. 963; Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co. 167 Minn. 475, 209 N. W. 635; Smith v. Independent Silo Co. 169 Minn. 96, 210 N. W. 624; Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Smith v. Independent Silo Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Zeglin v. YostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Stippel v. Charles Friend & SonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Bomersine v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Gustafson v. Ziesmer & Vorlander, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Batchelder v. Northwestern Hanna Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API