Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 23, 2017No. Case 5D17-196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrfinger, J.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in entering an order disbursing surplus proceeds from a foreclosure sale to the buyer to use to satisfy subordinate lienholders who were not parties to the foreclosure action. Because the issue is purely a question of law, our review is de novo. See Armstrong v. Harris, 773 So.2d 7, 11 (Fla. 2000).

Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) brought a foreclosure action against Carlos M. Rodriguez and Rafael Rodriguez, the property owners. No subordinate lienholders were named in the foreclosure complaint. In time, a final judgment was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Pineda v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GREEN EMERALD HOMES, L L C v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES TRUSTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. City of Hallandale Beach v. Susana ShamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  3. G & G 1016 LLC v. HERON BAY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API