Legal Opinion

Galbreath Hendrickson v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 23, 1944No. Docket Nos. 109045, 109046, 109047, 109048, 109084, 110818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Van Fossan, Judge-.

In these cases the question is whether any of the petitioners are liable for unjust enrichment taxes on payments made to Mrs. Galbreath. Since she returned the amounts received as income in the years of receipt, there is no question of income tax. The respondent claims the unjust enrichment tax under section 501 (a) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1936.1

It may be stated at the outset that petitioners do not contend that the partnership absorbed the tax and did not shift the burden to its vendees. Some proof to this end was introduced, but it covered only part of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Intervest Enterprises, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  2. Dependable Packing & Provision Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  3. Dependable Packing & Provision Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  4. Esrenco Truck Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  5. Intervest Enterprises, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API