Legal Opinion

Universal Metals & MacHinery, Inc. v. Bohart

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1976No. B-5351Published

1Opinion of the Court

539 S.W.2d 874 (1976)

UNIVERSAL METALS AND MACHINERY, INC., Petitioner,

v.

James T. BOHART, et ux., Respondents.

No. B-5351.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 23, 1976.

Turner, Rodgers, Sailers, Jordan & Calloway, John H. McElhaney, Dallas, for petitioner.

Tom James, Dallas, for respondents.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

POPE, Justice.

Universal Metals and a number of amicus curiae briefs forcefully urge that this court did not give Article 1302-2.09 its intended meaning by our original opinion. We are convinced that we were wrong in holding that the Boharts were not guarantors within the meaning of that statute…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Universal Metals & MacHinery, Inc. v. BohartTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. McKnight v. Virginia Mirror CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hernandez v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Reed v. BuckTexas Supreme Court · 1963

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API