Legal Opinion · Dissent

Midwest Foster Care & Adoption Ass'n v. Kincade

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 8, 2013No. 12-1834Published

1DissentSmith, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the CWA provisions at issue do not confer upon the Providers “a privately enforceable right under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 to receive payments from the State sufficient to cover the cost of certain statutorily enumerated components of foster care.” Consistent with the majority of courts to have addressed the issue, I would “hold that §§ 672(a) and 675(4)(A) of the [CWA] establish a presumptively enforceable right under § 1983 to foster care maintenance payments from the State that cover the cost of the expenses enumerated in § 675(4)(A).” Wagner,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API