Burke v. Beveridge
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was commenced in the court of common pleas of the county of Ramsey, by Anna Burke and William Burke, her husband, in January, 1869, to recover damages of the defendant, for alleged breaches for covenants in deed executed by the defendant to the said Anna Burke, in June, 1859. Issue was joined, and the cause tried before a jury who found a verdict for the plaintiffs.
Read the full summary
This action was commenced in the court of common pleas of the county of Ramsey, by Anna Burke and William Burke, her husband, in January, 1869, to recover damages of the defendant, for alleged breaches for covenants in deed executed by the defendant to the said Anna Burke, in June, 1859. Issue was joined, and the cause tried before a jury who found a verdict for the plaintiffs. The defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and he appeals from the order denying the same to this court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Ripley, Ch. J.
By the Court Defendant having at the time no title to lots 1, 2 and 3, block 33, in Hoyt’s addition to Saint Anthony, on the 8th day of June, 1859, executed, acknowledged and delivered to plaintiff, Anna Burke, a deed purporting to convey the same to her in fee, for the consideration therein named, of five hundred dollars, and with the usual covenants of seisin, right to convey, warranty, and for quiet enjoyment, which was duly recorded on the 11th day of June, 1859. Said lots were then vacant, as they have ever since remained.
The title to the premises was then in one Hoyt, who,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baxter v. BradburySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841
3Cited by16 opinions
- Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Moulton v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Gross v. WattsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Mary Jane Stevens Co. v. First Nat. Bldg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
- Hull v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.