Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1989No. 46690PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether the law as set forth in Baxter v. State, 254 Ga. 538, 548 (331 SE2d 561) (1985) was violated when the trial court refused the appellant’s motion to allow him to see writings that witnesses for the prosecution used to refresh their memories in the courtroom prior to testifying, but not while actually testifying. Johnson v. State, 190 Ga. App. 117 (378 SE2d 366) (1989). We reverse in part.

1. Some courts have recognized a right of access to writings that were used to refresh recollections during the course of a trial for over…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Baxter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Catchings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Caviness v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sterling v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Jennette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Render v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Salley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Cornwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API