Legal Opinion

Bautista v. Saul

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 26, 2020No. 3:18-cv-07693Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTONIO BAUTISTA, 7 Case No. 18-cv-07693-JCS Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY 9 JUDGMENT, DENYING ANDREW SAUL, DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 10 SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND Defendant. REMANDING FOR AWARD OF 11 BENEFITS 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Antonio Bautista brings this action appealing the final decision of Defendant 16 Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”)1 denying Bautista’s 17 application for disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API