Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 24786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

The facts which give rise to this motion are stated in the comments attached to the order of November 19, 1958, 208 F.Supp. 354 (Document No. 5 in Clerk’s file). By that order, defendant’s first Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings was granted on the ground that the Complaint did not show that defendant was notified in writing of the accident, in accordance with the conditions of the policy. Plaintiff was given leave to amend paragraph 22 of its Complaint to cure this deficiency, if possible. On December 18, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint, alleging in paragraph…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greaves v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'n v. Cal-Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Unverzagt v. PresteraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Ginder v. Harleysville Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Helvy v. Inland Mutual Insurance CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hargrove v. CNA Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. North River Insurance v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1964
  4. Western Freight Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API