Legal Opinion

Batdorf v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1981No. WCB No. 79-05894 CA A20932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Claimant appeals a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board, affirming the referee’s order, that an acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) was not compensably related to his employment. On de novo review, we reverse.

Claimant must establish both legal and medical causation in order to prove a compensable heart attack. Coday v. Willamette Tug and Barge, 250 Or 39, 49, 440 P2d 224 (1968); Foley v. SAIF, 29 Or App 151, 156, 562 P2d 593 (1977). In Williams v. Burns Int'l Security, 36 Or App 769, 778, 585 P2d 734 (1978), we noted that the cases have exhibited "confusion in determining…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Summit v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bales v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Adams v. Gilbert Tow ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Hamel v. Tri Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Thurston v. Mitchell Bros. ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Bales v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API